Flu vaccine backfires in pigs / vaccinated against H1N2 influenza were more vulnerable to the rarer H1N1 strain

Antibodies against one strain increase risk of infection with another.

28 August 2013
Pigs vaccinated against H1N2 influenza were more vulnerable to the rarer H1N1 strain.

Andy Rouse/Photoshot

Preventing seasonal sniffles may be more complicated than researchers suspected. A vaccine that protects piglets from one common influenza virus also makes them more vulnerable to a rarer flu strain, researchers report today in Science Translational Medicine1.

The team gave piglets a vaccine against H1N2 influenza. The animals responded by making antibodies that blocked that virus — but aided infection with the swine flu H1N1, which caused a pandemic among humans in 2009. In the study, H1N1 infected more cells and caused more severe pneumonia in vaccinated piglets than unvaccinated ones.

The root of the different immune responses lies with the mushroom-shaped haemagglutinin protein found on the outside of influenza-virus particles, which helps them to attach onto cells in the airways. The protein occurs in all types of flu, but the make-up of its cap and stem vary between strains.

In the study, a vaccine for H1N2 spurred pigs to produce antibodies that bound the cap and the stem of that virus’s haemagglutinin. But some of those antibodies also targeted the stem of H1N1’s haemagglutinin protein, helping that virus fuse to cell membranes. That made H1N1 more efficient at infecting pigs and causing disease.

Stem vaccines

The finding may give some vaccine developers pause. Much of the work to develop a universal flu vaccine has targeted the stems of haemagglutinin proteins, because they are relatively consistent across many types of influenza viruses.

The new study suggests that such vaccines could also produce antibodies that enhance the ability of some viruses to infect new hosts, says James Crowe, an immunologist at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee. But that does not mean that researchers should stop developing novel flu vaccines, including those that target haemagglutinin stems, he adds. “We should be very careful.”

Gary Nabel, a flu-vaccine researcher and chief scientific officer at the biotechnology firm Sanofi in Cambridge, Massachusetts, agrees. “It raises a warning flag, but at the same time it provides a tool to manage that risk,” he says of the new study’s results and methods.

Still, researchers have not yet tested whether human influenza vaccines can produce the same effect. And differences between pigs and humans make it difficult to interpret how relevant the findings are to the development of human vaccines, says Sarah Gilbert, a vaccine researcher at the University of Oxford, UK.

Lead author Hana Golding, a microbiologist at the US Food and Drug Administration in Bethesda, Maryland, agrees — and stresses that seasonal vaccines are still safe and effective. “This has no relevance to the regular vaccinations,” she says. “We think that people should definitely take them.”

Journal name:


  1. Khurana, S. et al. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 200ra114 (2013).




Categories: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: